SCENARIOS FOR THE FUTURE
FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY AND
A Rockefeller Foundation Report - 2010
by Luis B. Vega
for PostScripts News (PSN) | www.PostScripts.org
The purpose of this study is to expose the Rockefeller Foundation agenda that presented pandemic scenarios at least a decade before the COVID-19 release of the virus in 2019. It is astonishing how in 2010, the very conditions presently at play were talked about and predicted would occur in societies across the Nations of the planet. Such aspects are down to the exact prescriptions of how the lockdowns would need to be prolonged, with mask-covering, social distancing and virtual education. It anticipated the pushback and ultimate capitulation of the masses enough to be convinced that the key to the success of their ‘future’ and salvation would be found in technology.
It also predicted how governments, at all levels would use the ‘Virus Wars’ as the excuse to consolidated power and even more so after the pandemic was over. The following portions will only expose certain excerpts taken out from the report to highlight the specific section entitled LOCK STEP. The key portions of the text that deal with the plandemic will be highlighted and colorized for emphasis. This Rockefeller Foundation Scenario paper is really a cryptic ‘play book’ of how they have planned the final push to transition into their last Luciferian World Order. It shows how they plan all aspects of what the Rockefellers and similar types own and control, to have come together for this major Reset to occur. It is what Klaus Schwab is promulgating and is happening now throughout the whole world and are on the verse of accomplishing it.
They are using or misusing Science and Scientists for this nefarious purpose. Technology has always shaped the revolutionization of Humanity at all the key points in its history. According to Klaus Schwab, Humanity is transitioning into the 4th Industrial Revolution. It is characterized by essentially mankind merging with machine. For this to happen, the Globalists such as the Rockefeller Foundation and their cronies, knew that there had to be a wide range of developmental changes. Their ‘endgame’ involved a timeframe of around 15 years to start with, that being approximately the year 2025.
Thus, the various world scenarios where presented that could possibly determine how technology will be used to shape the capacity of individuals, society, and the world to ‘change’ on what Klaus Schwab calls a ‘Macro’ level. However, it should be noted that the use of technologies for the future will not and is not planned for the uplifting of vulnerable populations in the world. It is rather to use technology to subjugate all peoples of the world; to brand them like cattle and possess them for their Luciferian purposes that will essentially be do dehumanize them. See book of Revelation.
Based on interviews and secondary researches, the Rockefeller Foundation chose 2 uncertainties that would define the 4 scenarios for their ‘Future World Order’ run by technology and international government. These 2 uncertainties are rather divergent and challenging, because it depends on the degree the masses of the world will consent to. These 2 challenges the Reset will and is facing are Political and Economic Alignments and the people’s Adaptive Capacity. These obstacles are discussed in detail starting on page 15 of the Scenario paper. However, lessons can be learned from history when such tyrannies have been imposed to force transitional ‘revolutions’ upon Humanity, to ‘reset’ it. It was just more practice to eliminate the people who obstructed to such mandated changes. And if the book of Revelation is true, it will be no different.
But in this last ‘Reset’ before Jesus returns to put an end to their Luciferian interventions upon Humanity, the elimination of humans will be on such a grand scale never before seen nor ever will happen again according to the testimony of Jesus on this account. The scenario that the Rockefeller Foundation envisioned about a Corona Virus being released upon of the world has come to pass. Although since 2010, an attempt has been made as several types of viruses have been released. They were unsuccessful in reaching the levels of hysteria to be effective but now, the desired responses have been achieved. The difference? As it pertains to the USA, as the Head of the Nations and how then the rest of the world would follow is that the ability to use Propaganda is no longer against the law. Meaning?
That the mass media that the same Luciferians own, and control would now be used as the primary mode of instilling and sustaining the false the state of emergency through fear. There would be a need to only allow an ‘official narrative’ to help accomplish the needed and justified lockdowns. Why? The dismantling has to occur on a Macro level for this Luciferian takeover to be successful. All the current institutions need to be taken down to then be reconstituted for their Reset thereafter. In fact, the release of the Corona Virus plandemic has affected the need to ‘reset’ economic integration and political structures, as planned. The flow of goods, capital, movement of people, and their ideas have been compromised now. As political structures play a vital role to determine how a Nation faces a global challenge, it has been a different response in different Nations. However, the demand for technology has broken new levels of demand with the need to stay connected while practicing ‘social distancing’. Meaning?
The more advanced Nations like those of the 1st World will be the ones that will have their populations more easily infused with the technologies that will integrate them with the ‘machine’ Those peoples of the 3rd and 4th World will have the New World Order apparatus less likely to affect their ‘Reset’. However, come the rescue Mr. Bill Gates who foresaw the need to incorporate such less fortunate population as well into this Utopian Paradise. This closing the gap in technology has come by way of his ID2020 program in which all peoples in the developing countries will have an official identification ID but given to them through what? A vaccine. From their own website, ‘ID2020 is a non-governmental organization which advocates for digital ID for the billion undocumented people worldwide and under-served groups like refugees.
The NGO was relatively unknown before being publicized because of misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic by conspiracy theorists.’ Or is it because they were indeed exposed? Does one really think that by using the guise of helping poor children and refugees, although much needed is what their true motives are? No. These are one in the same Luciferians whose agencies traffic children for sex and slavery and create wars that result in refugees. Why is Blockchain involved in this? This is the grid system that is being developed by which all humans will be interfaced with a ‘Global Digital Wallet’, the merging of mankind and machine. And this by way of the coming mandated mRNA vaccine.
Essentially, it is the poor of destitute Nations and the refugees of the world that are being used as the test subjects to test their vaccination protocols. People’s identity will be solely biometric and that will be interfaced with the Blockchain. See Bill Gates Patent 060606 that seeks to do just that. The ID2020 website goes on to state, ‘Experts in blockchain and other cryptographic technology joined with representatives of technical standards bodies to identify how technology and other private sector expertise could achieve the goal. In 2019, ID2020 started a new digital identity program in collaboration with the government of Bangladesh and Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization.’
Another uncertainty that affects the future world of technology and international government is the capacity of people to cope with the ‘Macro’ change currently being enforced upon them worldwide. The Luciferians know that crisis demands adaptive capacity like managing existing systems or to upgrade the systems and structures to meet their new requirements. After all, their motto is ‘Order out of Chaos’. Thus, it is extremely important for them to ensure resilience against external forces or a challenge to their ‘official narrative’. Meaning? There will have to be censorship to silence any opposing narrative that even might be true or come from other Scientists challenging the ‘False Scientists’ being used to justify the lockdown due to a severe Flu. Nations may be experiencing different scenario outcomes that the report from the Rockefeller Foundation presents.
But one thing is for sure, the latest COVID-19 plandemic insured that the ‘Future World Order’ will depend on technology even more so than it is already is. With traveling prohibited and the majority of countries in lockdown, individuals and society are becoming more dependent on government instruction and their version of reality. Then the aftermath of the plandemic will diminish the need for physical contact. This ‘new normal’ as it is being programed into the minds of the people worldwide will help stem the opposition from organizing effectively. The Globalists were even considering long-term remote work strategies while they would need to crash the economy of the Lower and Middle Classes. It has come to pass and created a digital and economic divide, just as the Rockefeller Foundation envisioned since 2010. And they even delineated this and other aspects of their diabolical agenda for the world to see in their Table of Contents to start. The following are the introductions to the scenarios from the paper and then by the specific LOCK STEP section that predicts the specific release of a Corona Virus to help accomplish their Reset.
(From page 3)
Letter from Judith Rodin 4
Letter from Peter Schwartz 6
WHY SCENARIOS? 9
WHY TECHNOLOGY? 10
THE FOCAL QUESTION 11
ENGAGING YOUR IMAGINATION 11
The Scenario Framework 13
CHOOSING THE CRITICAL UNCERTAINTIES 14
GLOBAL POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC ALIGNMENT 15
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY 15
THE SCENARIO NARRATIVES 17
Lock Step 18
Clever Together 26
Hack Attack 34
Smart Scramble 42
Concluding Thoughts 49
(From page 4)
Letter from Judith Rodin
President of the Rockefeller Foundation
The Rockefeller Foundation supports work that expands opportunity and strengthens resilience to social, economic, health, and environmental challenges — affirming its pioneering philanthropic mission, since 1913, to “promote the well-being” of humanity. We take a synergistic, strategic approach that places a high value on innovative processes and encourages new ways of seeking ideas, to break down silos and encourage interdisciplinary thinking.
One important — and novel — component of our strategy toolkit is scenario planning, a process of creating narratives about the future based on factors likely to affect a particular set of challenges and opportunities. We believe that scenario planning has great potential for use in philanthropy to identify unique interventions, simulate and rehearse important decisions that could have profound implications, and highlight previously undiscovered areas of connection and intersection. Most important,
by providing a methodological structure that helps us focus on what we don’t know — instead of what we already know — scenario planning allows us to achieve impact more effectively. The results of our first scenario planning exercise demonstrate a provocative and engaging exploration of the role of technology and the future of globalization, as you will see in the following pages. This report is crucial reading for anyone interested in creatively considering the multiple, divergent ways in which our world could evolve. The sparks of insight inspiring these narratives — along with their implications for philanthropy as a whole — were generated through the invaluable collaboration of grantee representatives, external experts, and Rockefeller Foundation staff.
I offer a special thanks to Peter Schwartz, Andrew Blau, and the entire team at Global Business Network, who have helped guide us through this stimulating and energizing process. Leading this effort at the Rockefeller Foundation is our Research Unit, which analyzes emerging risks and opportunities and thinks imaginatively about how to respond to the complex, rapidly changing world around us. This outward-looking intelligence function adopts a cross-cutting mindset that synthesizes and integrates knowledge that accelerates our ability to act more quickly and effectively. It has also helped to shape and build the notion of “pro-poor foresight” that is committed to applying forward-looking tools and techniques to improve the lives of poor and vulnerable populations around the world. I hope this publication makes clear exactly why my colleagues and I are so excited about the promise of using scenario planning to develop robust strategies and offer a refreshing viewpoint on the possibilities that lie ahead. We welcome your feedback.
The Rockefeller Foundation
(From page 16)
Once crossed, these axes create a matrix of four very different futures:
LOCK STEP – A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback
CLEVER TOGETHER – A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues
HACK ATTACK – An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge
SMART SCRAMBLE – An economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems
(From pages 18-19)
A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
“IT IS POSSIBLE TO DISCIPLINE AND CONTROL SOME SOCIETIES FOR SOME TIME, BUT NOT THE WHOLE WORLD ALL THE TIME.”
– GK Bhat, TARU Leading Edge, India
(From page 23)
TECHNOLOGY IN LOCK STEP
While there is no way of accurately predicting what the important technological advancements will be in the future, the scenario narratives point to areas where conditions may enable or accelerate the development of certain kinds of technologies. Thus, for each scenario we offer a sense of the context for technological innovation, taking into consideration the pace, geography, and key creators. We also suggest a few technology trends and applications that could flourish in each scenario.
Technological innovation in “Lock Step” is largely driven by government and is focused on issues of national security and health and safety. Most technological improvements are created by and for developed countries, shaped by governments’ dual desire to control and to monitor their citizens. In states with poor governance, large-scale projects that fail to progress abound.
Technology trends and applications, we might see: Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.” In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.
New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many diseases. Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lower-bandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel is restricted.
Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls. Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.
This study has presented an exposé of the ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development’. It is a document that comes from the Rockefeller Foundation. It has existed since 1913 with the mission to promote the well-being of Humanity. It seeks to identify and accelerate breakthrough solutions and ideas to solve global challenges through various scenarios envisioned for the future, their future. It is very troubling to see how similar their scenarios are to what the world is facing right now in the wake of COVID-19 plandemic. The latest rendition of their plans came in 2010. It is practically a play-by-play of what one can see unfolding in today’s world.
Furthermore, the Rockefeller Foundation’s Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development is coupled with the United Nations’ Agenda 2030. It is a future where every person, animal, plant, water, air, on Earth will be ‘owned’, inventoried, tracked, and technologically controlled by a small group of individuals who are not known. They are the ones that have been working in the shadows. They are the entities that determine Humanity’s course. They are the ‘hidden hand’ Secret Societies guiding the whole world to this insidious fate of its own destruction. It will be a 3-year operational magic ritual, 2020-2021-2022 for achieving total control. The majority of the people in the world are not awake to the reality unfolding in this Luciferian initiation and transformational ‘Reset’. The division among the peoples of the world has been created by those that want to own all of Humanity through technology and will but temporarily.
This study brings to the front the concept of ‘LOCK STEP’. From page 18, LOCK STEP envisions a world of tighter top-down government controls and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback. In the page 19 excerpt, it paints a scenario in which the world has entered the ‘globalist’ plan or a ‘New World Order’. The goal of the Luciferian Globalists is the ultimately establish their ‘Authoritarian State’ that is ruled by 1 man, it will be the Biblical AntiChrist. He will rule the masses through technology that will employ a ‘Digital Population Control Network’.
Such technologies will incorporate the 5G+ wireless grid, Nanotechnology, DNA modification/manipulation vaccines, Artificial Intelligence, and vast synergistic integrations, etc. It is all this that will help create their Luciferian dystopian façade that scratches only the surface of the likes of the ‘fictitious’ novels of George Orwell’s ‘1984’ and Aldous Huxley’s ‘A Brave New World’. They are now the reality and in ‘LOCK STEP’ to each other.
Download document in PDF: